Evaluating Perennials for Chicagoland Gardens
Perennials in Focus is a plant evaluation program that examines new and underused plants for Chicagoland, the third largest metropolitan area in the country. A group of horticultural experts trials and evaluates plants at numerous locations across the region. Results help consumers, public gardens, growers, landscape designers, breeders, and other industry professionals make informed plant choices.
Tracking moisture loss in cold-stored bare-root perennials
Bare-root perennials are often shipped and stored in a dormant state, relying on stored energy reserves to survive until planting. One of the greatest risks during this period is desiccation, where the plant loses moisture through its crown, roots, and any remaining stem tissue. Cold temperatures slow metabolism and reduce immediate water needs, but they do not stop gradual moisture loss through evaporation and tissue breakdown. A well-designed trial can help growers understand exactly how much water these plants lose and what storage conditions best preserve their viability.
In regions with distinct dormant seasons, including much of Australia's temperate zones, bare-root stock is commonly held for weeks between harvest and planting. Whether you are a commercial grower in the Adelaide Hills or a hobbyist in Hobart preparing for a September planting, understanding moisture dynamics can mean the difference between a thriving perennial and a failed establishment. The Perennials in Focus program has long evaluated how dormant plants perform, and similar trial frameworks can be adapted to local conditions across the country.
Why moisture content matters during dormant storage
Bare-root perennials lose water through several pathways during cold storage. Even at near-freezing temperatures, plant tissues continue to respire at a reduced rate, consuming stored carbohydrates and releasing small amounts of water vapor. The root system, once severed from soil, has no way to replace what is lost, and crown tissue is particularly vulnerable to drying. If moisture levels drop too far, cell damage becomes irreversible, and the plant may fail to break dormancy or produce weak growth.
Commercial nurseries and mail-order suppliers have long recognized this challenge, often packing roots in moist peat, coir, sawdust, or wood shavings to maintain humidity. However, the effectiveness of these media varies, and temperature fluctuations during shipping and holding can accelerate moisture loss. A trial that compares different storage methods under controlled conditions provides objective data on which approaches truly preserve plant quality for the weeks between lifting and planting.
Designing a comparison trial
A rigorous trial begins with selecting uniform plant material. Choose bare-root perennials of similar size, caliper, and root mass from the same supplier lot. Label each plant clearly and record initial weights using a digital scale accurate to at least one gram. Divide the plants into treatment groups, ensuring each group contains the same species and similar-sized specimens to avoid bias in the final results.
Storage conditions should mimic real-world scenarios. In Australia, many growers hold bare-root stock in unheated sheds, cool rooms, or even domestic refrigerators set between 2 and 5°C. Trial treatments might include bare storage with no medium, storage in damp peat moss, storage in damp coir, and storage in perforated plastic bags. Place all groups in the same cold environment to isolate the effect of the wrapping method alone. Document ambient temperature and humidity at regular intervals throughout the trial period to account for external fluctuations.
Measuring weight loss over the storage period
Weight measurements taken at fixed intervals provide the clearest picture of moisture dynamics. Weigh each plant every seven days, handling specimens quickly to minimize exposure to warm air. Calculate percentage weight loss relative to the starting weight, and plot the data to visualize trends. A steady, gradual loss is expected, but sudden drops may indicate media drying out or temperature spikes within the storage environment.
Record keeping should also note visual changes such as shriveling, mold growth, or unusual odors. These qualitative observations complement the numerical data and help explain anomalies in the weight curves. In a Melbourne-based trial, for example, a sudden rise in ambient temperature during an unexpected heatwave could cause media to dry rapidly, skewing results if not accounted for in the final analysis.
Comparing common storage media
Different media retain moisture at different rates and interact with roots in distinct ways. Peat moss has been a traditional choice due to its high water-holding capacity, though environmental concerns have led many Australian growers to switch to coir, a byproduct of the coconut industry. Sawdust and wood shavings are inexpensive but can dry out faster and may harbor pathogens if not properly composted before use.
A well-designed trial reveals which media maintain consistent moisture over weeks of storage. Coir typically performs well in trials, holding moisture without becoming waterlogged, while peat can compact and reduce air oxygen around roots. Bare storage without any medium usually results in the highest weight loss, often exceeding 20 percent of initial weight within a month, whereas properly moistened media can keep losses below 5 percent. These differences directly affect planting success and early growth vigor in the garden.
Linking moisture loss to spring planting success
The ultimate measure of storage success is how plants perform after planting. After the storage period, pot up all specimens in identical substrate and growing conditions, then track emergence, growth rate, and overall vigor. Plants that lost excessive moisture often show delayed sprouting, weaker stems, and reduced flowering in the first season.
This is where broader plant performance data becomes valuable. Growers interested in long-term performance can consult resources like minimal division perennials to identify varieties that maintain vigor beyond the establishment year. Combining moisture trial data with multi-year performance records gives a complete picture of how storage practices affect garden results over multiple seasons.
Adapting trial findings for Australian growers
Australian conditions introduce unique variables that must be considered when interpreting moisture loss data. Much of the country experiences mild winters, meaning cold storage facilities may not be as consistently cold as those in northern regions. In Sydney and Brisbane, winter temperatures rarely drop low enough to satisfy the chilling requirements of some temperate perennials, yet they slow moisture loss compared to warmer summer conditions.
In southern Australia, including Adelaide, Canberra, and parts of Victoria, growers often deal with dry winter air that can accelerate desiccation in stored stock. Using humidified cold rooms or sealed containers with damp media becomes even more critical in these regions. Local suppliers such as those servicing the Diggers Club membership or specialty native plant nurseries may already conduct internal trials, and gardeners purchasing bare-root stock can ask suppliers about their storage protocols and moisture management practices.
Practical steps for your own storage trial
Home gardeners and small-scale growers can run simplified versions of these trials with minimal equipment. Start with a few bare-root perennials of the same variety, weigh them on a kitchen scale, and divide them into groups using different storage methods. A dedicated fridge drawer set to around 4°C works well for small batches and mimics professional cool room conditions.
Weigh the plants weekly and note any changes in texture or appearance. After four to six weeks, pot them up and observe which treatment group emerges first and grows most vigorously. Even without statistical rigor, this hands-on experience teaches valuable lessons about how moisture management affects perennial establishment in your specific microclimate.
| Storage method | Typical moisture loss (4 weeks) | Effect on emergence | Best use case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bare, no wrapping | 15-25% | Delayed, weak | Short-term holding only |
| Damp peat moss | 4-8% | Normal | Traditional choice |
| Damp coir | 3-6% | Vigorous | Sustainable alternative |
| Perforated plastic bag | 6-12% | Variable | Shipping and retail |
Applying the insights from a moisture loss trial can transform how you handle bare-root perennials, whether you manage a commercial nursery in Perth or tend a cottage garden in Hobart. Start a small test this winter, document your findings, and adjust your storage practices based on real results rather than guesswork. Explore ongoing evaluation work and additional resources for your perennial gardening journey at Perennials in Focus.
In the Garden
Evaluator gardens are located across the Chicagoland area, representing a range of growing conditions. Visit our retail and wholesale partners to find trialled perennials for your own garden.
Retail & Wholesale: Hinsdale Nurseries (Willowbrook, IL), Mariani Nurseries (Kenosha, WI & Garden Prairie, IL), Northwind Perennials (Burlington, WI), The Growing Place (Aurora, IL).
Wholesale Only: Hinsdale Nurseries (Plano, IL), Intrinsic Perennial Gardens (Hebron, IL).
Our Evaluation Program
The 2017–2020 evaluation cycle included Agastache 'Blue Boa', Allium senescens 'Blue Eddy', Amsonia ciliata var. filifolia 'Georgia Pancake', Astilbe 'Chocolate Shogun', Boltonia astroides 'James Crocket', Brunnera 'Alexander's Great', and Geranium cinereum 'Jolly Jewel Purple'. Completed evaluations include Amsonia 'Blue Ice' (2004–07).
On April 10, 2020, the program published snapshot profiles for Vernonia lettermanii 'Iron Butterfly', Stokesia laevis 'Elf', Stachys officinalis 'Pink Cotton Candy', Lobelia 'Monet Moment', Helleborus 'Winter Thrillers', Geum 'Mai Tai', Geranium soboliferum 'Butterfly Kisses', Gentiana x intermedia 'True Blue', Eurybia divaricata, Asparagus 'Purple Passion', and Agastache 'Bolero'.
Browse the full collection of snapshots organized alphabetically — from A–D, E–H, I–Q, and R–Z — to find detailed performance data on perennials trialled across Chicagoland.